Date: Jan 17, 2013 5:52 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: WMatheology § 191
On 17 Jan., 08:42, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:

> In a similar way it seems to be

> impossible for Mückenheim to grasp something actually (not in the

> always-growing sense) countably infinite without a boundary at the far end.

Not at all! I consider and vivdly imagine the actually infinite set of

all terminating decimal representations of the reals containg all

natural numbers as indices. Alas I cannot imagine that there is

another decimal representations of the reals which deviates from all

of them. Can you?

Regards, WM