Date: Jan 17, 2013 12:53 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: WMatheology § 191
On 17 Jan., 18:30, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

> But, in failing to provide reasonable

> alternatives (that is the hard part), you

> do nothing constructive.

I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show:

Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he

proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal

representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra.

> You, however, simply whine.

I am not in position to save the world of mathematics. But I can show

where it has gone astray.

Regards, WM