Date: Jan 17, 2013 5:29 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: WMatheology � 191

In article 
<c41208b9-d34b-4fe4-b575-aa21c57341e9@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 17 Jan., 18:30, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>

> > But, in failing to provide reasonable
> > alternatives (that is the hard part), you
> > do nothing constructive.

>
> I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show:
> Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he
> proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal
> representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra.


Anyone who misreads Cantor's "diagoan;" argument so totally, is both a
knave and a fool.
>
> > You, however, simply whine.
>
> I am not in position to save the world of mathematics.



Certainly not so long as you seek to destroy it, as you do.

> But I can show
> where it has gone astray.


Curious that so many real mathematicians disagree with WM on that issue,
and so few real mathematicians (none at last count) agree with WM.
--