Date: Jan 17, 2013 5:29 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: WMatheology � 191

In article 
WM <> wrote:

> On 17 Jan., 18:30, fom <> wrote:

> > But, in failing to provide reasonable
> > alternatives (that is the hard part), you
> > do nothing constructive.

> I need not be oviparous in order to recognize a rotten egg. I show:
> Cantor's "proof" is based upon finite initial segments solely. So he
> proves that there are uncountably many terminating decimal
> representations. The infinity of the used strings is but abracadabra.

Anyone who misreads Cantor's "diagoan;" argument so totally, is both a
knave and a fool.
> > You, however, simply whine.
> I am not in position to save the world of mathematics.

Certainly not so long as you seek to destroy it, as you do.

> But I can show
> where it has gone astray.

Curious that so many real mathematicians disagree with WM on that issue,
and so few real mathematicians (none at last count) agree with WM.