Date: Jan 17, 2013 5:38 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: WMatheology S 191

WM <> writes:

> "I can prove that there exists
> according to current mathematics
> an n which requires more than 10^80 bits
> to name it. This n does not exist
> in reality."

Only in the sense that all numbers are merely mental images and have no
other form of existence.

Or is WM speaking merely of numerals, which are names for, or pionters
to, numbers and not actually numbers themselves.

But then, WM is never quit sure what he is speaking of.