```Date: Jan 21, 2013 12:39 AM
Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
Subject: superconductivity magnitude of the Temperature Induced Current<br> Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1165 New<br> Physics #1285 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

At room temperature, silver and copper have theseresistivities.silverat 1.59*10^-8 (in Ohms) ?and copper at 1.68*10^-8Now the question is, what is the induced current from a flux inTemperature?In the Faraday law we have a flux in the bar magnet motion in a closedcoil of wire. In Superconductivity, we have a flux in the temperaturefrom the inside of the experiment to the outside world. The magneticmonopoles that compose Space has a differential of temperature of theexperiment and the outside world which gives rise to a tiny minutecurrent in the closed loop wire. So that Superconductivity is thisform of a electric current:Superconductivity = induced temperature current + applied externalcurrentNormal Conductivity = applied external currentSo what is a magnitude for the induced temperature current? Well, ifwe apply Occam's Razor to that of silver and say that silver is thehighest normal conductivity with its resistivity of 1.59*10^-8 (inOhms). Then, let us say the induced temperature current is equal tothe current of 1.59*10^-8 (in Ohms).Let us be logical, in that a correct theory of Superconductivity willexplain not only superconductors but normal conductors.Important question: why would elements be the highest normalconductors, while compounds are the highest temperaturesuperconductors? The BCS theory never explains it because BCS is fakephysics. What does explain it is that temperature is a component ofthe Maxwell Equations and that temperature is bottled up in the termsof Gauss's law of magnetism with magnetic monopoles and Faraday's lawwith the magnetic current density term.With temperature as a factor in the Maxwell Equations we go fromsuperconductivity at near 0 to about 140 Kelvin and normalconductivity from 140 onwards.It is seldom appreciated by anyone interested in electricity thatcurrents flowing in wires at room temperature do remarkably well andin ease of current flow over long distances as compared to saycurrents of water or liquids. We seldom take the time to look at theworld and say "electricity really flows well in this world of ours."In fact, so well that silver resistivity is almost superconductivityitself, considering how much we have to tamper with the temperature ofthe surroundings in superconductivity.So in this reflection mode, how much of a gap or boundary is therebetween superconductivity and the silver conductivity? Actually, notmuch of a gap at all once we add in how much we insert in energy tocool the surroundings.So the compounds used to make superconductivity is that the compoundsprovide the rigidity of structure that the increasing temperaturewould cause in increasing resistance. At a temperature of 0 Celcius,silver has that resistivity of 1.59*10^-8 (in Ohms) but if thetemperature were 100 Celcius, then a compound of silver would bebetter and do better than pure elemental bonded silver.So a true theory of Superconductivity must start with the MaxwellEquations, with magnetic monopoles and with temperature a term in theMaxwell Equations, for we all know that magnetism fades off if thetemperature increases. And a true theory of superconductivity musttreat silver normal conduction as a seamless phenomenon fromsuperconductivity.--Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple andfair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutoniumwhole entire Universe is just one big atomwhere dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
```