Date: Jan 21, 2013 12:39 AM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: superconductivity magnitude of the Temperature Induced Current<br> Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1165 New<br> Physics #1285 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed At room temperature, silver and copper have these

resistivities.

silver

at 1.59*10^-8 (in Ohms) ?and copper at 1.68*10^-8

Now the question is, what is the induced current from a flux in

Temperature?

In the Faraday law we have a flux in the bar magnet motion in a closed

coil of wire. In Superconductivity, we have a flux in the temperature

from the inside of the experiment to the outside world. The magnetic

monopoles that compose Space has a differential of temperature of the

experiment and the outside world which gives rise to a tiny minute

current in the closed loop wire. So that Superconductivity is this

form of a electric current:

Superconductivity = induced temperature current + applied external

current

Normal Conductivity = applied external current

So what is a magnitude for the induced temperature current? Well, if

we apply Occam's Razor to that of silver and say that silver is the

highest normal conductivity with its resistivity of 1.59*10^-8 (in

Ohms). Then, let us say the induced temperature current is equal to

the current of 1.59*10^-8 (in Ohms).

Let us be logical, in that a correct theory of Superconductivity will

explain not only superconductors but normal conductors.

Important question: why would elements be the highest normal

conductors, while compounds are the highest temperature

superconductors? The BCS theory never explains it because BCS is fake

physics. What does explain it is that temperature is a component of

the Maxwell Equations and that temperature is bottled up in the terms

of Gauss's law of magnetism with magnetic monopoles and Faraday's law

with the magnetic current density term.

With temperature as a factor in the Maxwell Equations we go from

superconductivity at near 0 to about 140 Kelvin and normal

conductivity from 140 onwards.

It is seldom appreciated by anyone interested in electricity that

currents flowing in wires at room temperature do remarkably well and

in ease of current flow over long distances as compared to say

currents of water or liquids. We seldom take the time to look at the

world and say "electricity really flows well in this world of ours."

In fact, so well that silver resistivity is almost superconductivity

itself, considering how much we have to tamper with the temperature of

the surroundings in superconductivity.

So in this reflection mode, how much of a gap or boundary is there

between superconductivity and the silver conductivity? Actually, not

much of a gap at all once we add in how much we insert in energy to

cool the surroundings.

So the compounds used to make superconductivity is that the compounds

provide the rigidity of structure that the increasing temperature

would cause in increasing resistance. At a temperature of 0 Celcius,

silver has that resistivity of 1.59*10^-8 (in Ohms) but if the

temperature were 100 Celcius, then a compound of silver would be

better and do better than pure elemental bonded silver.

So a true theory of Superconductivity must start with the Maxwell

Equations, with magnetic monopoles and with temperature a term in the

Maxwell Equations, for we all know that magnetism fades off if the

temperature increases. And a true theory of superconductivity must

treat silver normal conduction as a seamless phenomenon from

superconductivity.

--

Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-

bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and

fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium

http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium

whole entire Universe is just one big atom

where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies