Date: Jan 23, 2013 4:10 AM
Author: David Bernier
Subject: Re: How to read stackexchange.math ?
On 01/22/2013 05:38 PM, Mr. Anchovy wrote:
> In article<email@example.com>,
> Timothy Murphy<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Mr. Anchovy wrote:
>>>> Then: they begin to introduce "ads" - they are conceptually
>>>> made *to catch* attention - and that's what they do!
>>>> So, even and explicitely intentionally, this disrupts
>>>> my concentration on the contents of the mathematical discourse.
>>> It is the price to be paid to get away from kooks and cranks:
>>> powerful kooks and cranks
>> I don't see why.
>> They appear to me to be two orthogonal forms of annoyance.
> Do not understand "orthogonal" here. My point is that
> you choose who is going to annoy you, because we do not
> escape it. Once, long ago, I read in a book on
> morphology a catalogue of observable phenomena that
> could be used to define life. I forgot all of them
> except "irritability." We are not alive unless we are
I heard that a survey of medical doctors showed anaesthesia as
one of the top advances in medicine, according to
the doctors ...
dracut:/# lvm vgcfgrestore
File descriptor 9 (/.console_lock) leaked on lvm invocation. Parent PID
Please specify a *single* volume group to restore.