```Date: Jan 25, 2013 1:58 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: ZFC and God

In article <23c75ce4-2ede-43e1-87d2-a61866fe1787@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 25 Jan., 01:23, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> > In article> > <1bff3260-2afe-4cb5-b296-cbfcd9313...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,> >> >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> > > On 24 Jan., 21:43, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> >> > > > > > U_n {1,...,n} is not infinite. (*)> >> > > > > It is not actually infinite. The cardinality is not larger than every> > > > > n.> >> > > > Then there must be some n that it is not larger than.> >> > > > Either> >> > > There can be every n. Because no n is infinite!> >> > If there can be "every n", then there can be set containing "every n".> > There can be the set of all terminating decimal fractions (0. d_1,> d_2, ..., d_n), containing every n as the last digit, is a set without> non-terminating decimal fraction, isn't it?How would the existence of such a set prevent the existence of a set of all decimals between 0 and 1? > >> >> >> > > What is actually infinite is something that has *no* last n, if I> > > remember correctly what you have said.> >> > You have not!> >> > That only would apply to ordered sets, like |N> > you mean the indices of digits of decimal fractions?|N has many other uses.> > Regards, WM--
```