Date: Jan 25, 2013 7:07 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: ZFC and God
In article

<3cff19c6-f362-4ef4-9609-3159bd5f9c73@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 25 Jan., 19:52, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:

> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:

> > >> Is t_i(i) also defined for every i in N?

> >

> > > Yes, of course, with absolute certainty.

> >

> > >> Assuming you will say yes, then I must ask:

> >

> > >> Is d(i) therefore defined for every i in N?

> >

> > > Yes, of course, with absolute certainty.

> >

> > > And nothing of that takes us out of the domain of all terminating

> > > decimals, because ;

> >

> > >> > In ZF every n in N is finite.

> >

> > > and with it every FISON.

> >

> > Well, let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet.

> >

> > You agree that, for every i in N, d(i) is defined.

> >

> > I suppose you also agree that, for every i in N, d(i) != 0 and

> > d(i) != 9, right?

> >

> > Okay, so d(i) is defined for every i in N, and d(i) is non-zero and

> > not nine.

> >

> > Clearly, d is a non-terminating decimal.

>

> The set of all FISONs is not terminating. Is there a non-terminating

> FISON? No.

If a set of all FISONs exists at all, which that above statement

concedes, then the union all members of that set is a set, after which,

exist decimals with a digit for each member of that union.

WM cannot have it both ways.

>

> Try to understand that and evaluate the consequences. It is useless to

> go on unless you got it that we work in the domain of terminating

> decimals.

Which hellhole WM condemns himself to work in is irrelevant to anyone

else, as others can easily work elsewhere, and do.

--