Date: Jan 29, 2013 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 203
On 29 Jan., 19:54, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 1/29/2013 12:21 PM, WM wrote:
> > Done several times. Nevertheless logic and analysis can get along
> > without sets. And that better than with.
> Have you any references for the presentation
> of analysis without sets?
> I mean, here, textbooks. I would love to
> look at one.
Is that a real question?
A very good book without any sets:
Euler: Introductio in analysin infinitorum
Or newer and at least without actually infinite sets, i.e., without
*trans*finite sets my book: