Date: Jan 29, 2013 6:50 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 203

In article 
<984415d6-0f8d-45dd-b1c5-ed58000837e1@u7g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 29 Jan., 19:54, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > On 1/29/2013 12:21 PM, WM wrote:
> >

> > > Done several times. Nevertheless logic and analysis can get along
> > > without sets. And that better than with.

> >
> > Have you any references for the presentation
> > of analysis without sets?
> >
> > I mean, here, textbooks.  I would love to
> > look at one.

>
> Is that a real question?
> A very good book without any sets:
> Euler: Introductio in analysin infinitorum
> Or newer and at least without actually infinite sets, i.e., without
> *trans*finite sets my book:
> http://www.oldenbourg-verlag.de/wissenschaftsverlag/mathematik-ersten-semester
> /9783486708219avoid WM.


Given a choice between Euler and WM, avoid WM.
--