```Date: Jan 30, 2013 2:16 AM
Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
Subject: beauty of EM circles in Space; why Physics needs axioms #1190 New<br> Physics #1310 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

The beauty of EM, going around in a circle forceNow today I had a physics insight of wisdom. Those rare occasions inwhich you know something so well that you have an insight thatencompasses the entire subject of physics. Let me tell the experienceas fast as possible.In electricity magnetism of a physics textbook covers much of thetextbook, there are chapters of gravity, there are chapters ofthermodynamics and chapters of nuclear physics. But of all the topicsof physics, only physics is the science of going around in a circle, aelectric circuit and where the force is breaking up of Space and thenputting Space back together. Only EM is where you have Space of a wireloop and you move a magnet and have that Space broken up into aelectric current flow and then remove the magnet, and space is backtogether as before.Here is the beauty of that realization. Let us take Gravity. Isgravity a closed loop where you bring in some material object and moveit around and there is a change in the closed loop and Space and thenyou remove the object and the Space is as was previously? No.Let us take Thermodynamics. Can we take a close loop in Space inthermodynamics and enter some material to make the loop change, Spaceto change and then restore Space to its original form? No again.Only the topic of Electricity and Magnetism is unique to physics forit is the topic in which depends on loops or circles back to a sourceand which you draw out forces and energy from just pure Space of theloop.So what is the deep meaning, the deep importance?It is the fact that only EM is the dynamics of Space and that EM isthe axioms of physics. So that EM can derive gravity, derivethermodynamics, derive nuclear physics, for only EM takes a loop inSpace and generates energy and forces from space and then puts themback together as before.If Gravity or Thermodynamics were the axioms of physics, then ingravity or thermodynamics, they would depend on a circle in Space andbreaking up that circle with a motion of an object to have energy andforces coming out and then restoring that Space to original form.Of course my above message is meaningless to those who have notmastered or learned physics. The above is meaningful to those who havelearned physics, and who realize that there is something mysteriouslydifferent and powerful about EM, for it is totally unlike other topicsof physics like gravity or thermodynamics or nuclear physics. EM isthe heart of physics and from EM you can derive these outlying minortopics of gravity, thermodynamics, nuclear physics, quantum mechanics.I could break into poetry here:Behold, to take Spaceand draw a circle in itand thrust a metal barand how other bodiesmove around that circlethen removing the barthe Space is back to before.This post belongs in the chapter of the axioms of physics.Now another beautiful reflection hit me today also.It is a question more than a reflection of wisdom.The question is how much would mathematics haveprogressed or developed if mathematics never hadaxioms? Would not mathematics be a compartmentalized subject withlittle coherence or consistency if not for an axiom system. Would notgeometry by a thousand pieces detached from one another? Would math bejust calculations and details but never any broad expansive theory?Would math be just a huge list of rules and details of facts.It is hard to imagine mathematics without axioms. But why wouldPhysics, the subject that subsumes mathematics, why would Physics evergo on without axioms? And without axioms of physics, it is just asubject of many compartments that seem to never relate to one another.--Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple andfair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutoniumwhole entire Universe is just one big atomwhere dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
```