Date: Jan 30, 2013 2:16 AM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: beauty of EM circles in Space; why Physics needs axioms #1190 New<br> Physics #1310 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

The beauty of EM, going around in a circle force

Now today I had a physics insight of wisdom. Those rare occasions in

which you know something so well that you have an insight that

encompasses the entire subject of physics. Let me tell the experience

as fast as possible.

In electricity magnetism of a physics textbook covers much of the

textbook, there are chapters of gravity, there are chapters of

thermodynamics and chapters of nuclear physics. But of all the topics

of physics, only physics is the science of going around in a circle, a

electric circuit and where the force is breaking up of Space and then

putting Space back together. Only EM is where you have Space of a wire

loop and you move a magnet and have that Space broken up into a

electric current flow and then remove the magnet, and space is back

together as before.

Here is the beauty of that realization. Let us take Gravity. Is

gravity a closed loop where you bring in some material object and move

it around and there is a change in the closed loop and Space and then

you remove the object and the Space is as was previously? No.

Let us take Thermodynamics. Can we take a close loop in Space in

thermodynamics and enter some material to make the loop change, Space

to change and then restore Space to its original form? No again.

Only the topic of Electricity and Magnetism is unique to physics for

it is the topic in which depends on loops or circles back to a source

and which you draw out forces and energy from just pure Space of the

loop.

So what is the deep meaning, the deep importance?

It is the fact that only EM is the dynamics of Space and that EM is

the axioms of physics. So that EM can derive gravity, derive

thermodynamics, derive nuclear physics, for only EM takes a loop in

Space and generates energy and forces from space and then puts them

back together as before.

If Gravity or Thermodynamics were the axioms of physics, then in

gravity or thermodynamics, they would depend on a circle in Space and

breaking up that circle with a motion of an object to have energy and

forces coming out and then restoring that Space to original form.

Of course my above message is meaningless to those who have not

mastered or learned physics. The above is meaningful to those who have

learned physics, and who realize that there is something mysteriously

different and powerful about EM, for it is totally unlike other topics

of physics like gravity or thermodynamics or nuclear physics. EM is

the heart of physics and from EM you can derive these outlying minor

topics of gravity, thermodynamics, nuclear physics, quantum mechanics.

I could break into poetry here:

Behold, to take Space

and draw a circle in it

and thrust a metal bar

and how other bodies

move around that circle

then removing the bar

the Space is back to before.

This post belongs in the chapter of the axioms of physics.

Now another beautiful reflection hit me today also.

It is a question more than a reflection of wisdom.

The question is how much would mathematics have

progressed or developed if mathematics never had

axioms? Would not mathematics be a compartmentalized subject with

little coherence or consistency if not for an axiom system. Would not

geometry by a thousand pieces detached from one another? Would math be

just calculations and details but never any broad expansive theory?

Would math be just a huge list of rules and details of facts.

It is hard to imagine mathematics without axioms. But why would

Physics, the subject that subsumes mathematics, why would Physics ever

go on without axioms? And without axioms of physics, it is just a

subject of many compartments that seem to never relate to one another.

--

Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-

bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and

fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium

http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium

whole entire Universe is just one big atom

where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies