Date: Jan 30, 2013 3:40 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 203
On Jan 30, 9:28 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 30 Jan., 00:16, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > On Jan 29, 10:11 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > On 29 Jan., 21:28, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > <snip>

>

> > > > It does, however, imply that d in not one

> > > > of the lines of the list L

>

> > > For that sake you must check all lines. Can you check what is not

> > > existing?

>

> > So now your claim is

>

> > We can know

>

> > There does not exist a natural number n

> > such that d is equal to the nth line

> > of L

>

> > but we cannot know

>

> > d is not one of the lines of L

>

> You are trying hard to misunderstand!

>

Do you agree

i. There does not exist a natural number n

such that d is equal to the nth line

of L

and

ii. d is one of the lines of L

are mutually exclusive?