Date: Jan 30, 2013 4:05 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician
In article

<be25af6f-9ad7-4bcd-a2d1-4e479418c2b4@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 30 Jan., 02:26, "W. Dale Hall" <wdh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> > david petry wrote:

> >

> > > Doron Zeilberger wrote the following in an opinion piece on his website:

> >

> > > "Read Wolfgang Mueckenheim's fascinating book ! I especially like the

> > > bottom

> >

> > > of page 112 and the top of page 113, that prove, once and for all,

> > that (at least)

> >

> > > the actual infinity is pure nonsense."

> >

> > >http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion68.html

> >

> > > I'd be interested in seeing an English translation of the bottom of page

> > > 112 and the top of page 113.

> >

> > I suppose you missed the statement that immediately followed that:

> >

> > Clarification added Aug. 25, 2011: My endorsement of Wolfgang

> > Mueckenheim's wonderful book is purely philosophical. I have no

> > expertise, or interest, in checking any possible technical

> > claims that he may have made.

>

> Have you seen the difference in dates?

Unless the clarification is dated earlier than the original, what

difference does it make?

--