Date: Jan 30, 2013 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician
WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 30 Jan., 02:26, "W. Dale Hall" <wdh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > david petry wrote:
> > > Doron Zeilberger wrote the following in an opinion piece on his website:
> > > "Read Wolfgang Mueckenheim's fascinating book ! I especially like the
> > > bottom
> > > of page 112 and the top of page 113, that prove, once and for all,
> > that (at least)
> > > the actual infinity is pure nonsense."
> > >http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion68.html
> > > I'd be interested in seeing an English translation of the bottom of page
> > > 112 and the top of page 113.
> > I suppose you missed the statement that immediately followed that:
> > Clarification added Aug. 25, 2011: My endorsement of Wolfgang
> > Mueckenheim's wonderful book is purely philosophical. I have no
> > expertise, or interest, in checking any possible technical
> > claims that he may have made.
> Have you seen the difference in dates?
Unless the clarification is dated earlier than the original, what
difference does it make?