Date: Jan 30, 2013 4:05 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician

In article 
<be25af6f-9ad7-4bcd-a2d1-4e479418c2b4@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 30 Jan., 02:26, "W. Dale Hall" <wdh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > david petry wrote:
> >

> > > Doron Zeilberger wrote the following in an opinion piece on his website:
> >
> > > "Read Wolfgang Mueckenheim's fascinating book ! I especially like the
> > > bottom

> >
> >  > of page 112 and the top of page 113, that prove, once and for all,
> > that (at least)
> >

> > > the actual infinity is pure nonsense."
> >
> > >http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion68.html
> >
> > > I'd be interested in seeing an English translation of the bottom of page
> > > 112 and the top of page 113.

> >
> > I suppose you missed the statement that immediately followed that:
> >
> >         Clarification added Aug. 25, 2011: My endorsement of Wolfgang
> >         Mueckenheim's wonderful book is purely philosophical. I have no
> >         expertise, or interest, in checking any possible technical
> >         claims that he may have made.

>
> Have you seen the difference in dates?


Unless the clarification is dated earlier than the original, what
difference does it make?
--