Date: Jan 30, 2013 8:11 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 203

In article 
<a3cc326d-badc-47e1-98b4-ee058530b504@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 30 Jan., 12:32, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 12:21 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >

> > > On 30 Jan., 12:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Summary.  We have agreed that
> >
> > > > For a potentially infinite list L, the
> > > > antidiagonal of L is not a line of L.

> >
> > Do you agree with the statement
> >
> > For a potentially infinite list, L,
> > of potentially infinite 0/1 sequences
> > the antidiagonal of L is not a line
> > of L

>
> Yes, of course.


Thus every merely potentially infinite list is incomplete.

As is every actually infinite list of actually infinite sequences of two
or more symbols, even outside of Wolkenmuekenheim.
--