Date: Jan 30, 2013 8:11 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 203
In article

<a3cc326d-badc-47e1-98b4-ee058530b504@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 30 Jan., 12:32, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Jan 30, 12:21 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >

> > > On 30 Jan., 12:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > > > Summary. We have agreed that

> >

> > > > For a potentially infinite list L, the

> > > > antidiagonal of L is not a line of L.

> >

> > Do you agree with the statement

> >

> > For a potentially infinite list, L,

> > of potentially infinite 0/1 sequences

> > the antidiagonal of L is not a line

> > of L

>

> Yes, of course.

Thus every merely potentially infinite list is incomplete.

As is every actually infinite list of actually infinite sequences of two

or more symbols, even outside of Wolkenmuekenheim.

--