```Date: Jan 31, 2013 4:55 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 203

In article <cface2f2-6612-4fb4-b0ba-8e113a1f2e55@l13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 30 Jan., 22:38, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> > On Jan 30, 10:24 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> >> >> >> >> >> > > On 30 Jan., 22:14, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> >> > > > On Jan 30, 6:06 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> >> > > > > On 30 Jan., 12:32, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> >> > > > > > On Jan 30, 12:21 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> >> > > > > > > On 30 Jan., 12:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> >> > > > > > > > Summary.  We have agreed that> >> > > > > > > > For a potentially infinite list L, the> > > > > > > > antidiagonal of L is not a line of L.> >> > > > > > Do you agree with the statement> >> > > > > > For a potentially infinite list, L,> > > > > > of potentially infinite 0/1 sequences> > > > > > the antidiagonal of L is not a line> > > > > > of L> >> > > > > Yes, of course. We have a collection of which we can keep a general> > > > > overview. And in finite sets (potential infinity is nothing but finity> > > > > without an upper threshold) "for every" means the same as "for all".> > > > > There is no place to hide.> >> > > > So now we have> >> > > > For a potentially infinite list, L,> > > > of potentially infinite 0/1 sequences> > > > the antidiagonal of L is not a line> > > > of L> >> > > > Can a potentially infinite list, L,> > > > of potentially infinite 0/1 sequences> > > > have the property that every> > > > potentially infinite 0/1 sequence> > > > is a line of L?> >> > > Potential infinity is the opposite of completeness like "infinite" is> > > the opposite of "finished". So *every* line number n would not imply> > > *all* possible line numbers of the set |N defined by AxInf.> >> > This does not answer the question.  Please answer the question.-> > The question is not properly defined.It is defined quite well enough that  anyone not self condemned to WMytheology should be able to answer it.--
```