Date: Feb 4, 2013 4:19 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 203

On Feb 4, 5:29 am, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 2/3/2013 9:20 PM, Virgil wrote:

> >> There is no sensible way of saying that 0.111... is more than every
> >> FIS.

>
> > How about "For all f, (f is a FIS) -> (length(0.111...) > length(f))" .
>
> In view of WM's positions, length(0.111...) would have
> to be the value given to a non-existent.


Nope. According to WM the 0.111... is the potentially
infinite sequence {.1, .11, .111, ...}
It certainly exists


So length(0.111...) would be the potentially infinite
sequence {1,2,3, ...}

Thus extending length to infinite sequences is not
problematic.