Date: Feb 4, 2013 4:19 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 203
On Feb 4, 5:29 am, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

> On 2/3/2013 9:20 PM, Virgil wrote:

> >> There is no sensible way of saying that 0.111... is more than every

> >> FIS.

>

> > How about "For all f, (f is a FIS) -> (length(0.111...) > length(f))" .

>

> In view of WM's positions, length(0.111...) would have

> to be the value given to a non-existent.

Nope. According to WM the 0.111... is the potentially

infinite sequence {.1, .11, .111, ...}

It certainly exists

So length(0.111...) would be the potentially infinite

sequence {1,2,3, ...}

Thus extending length to infinite sequences is not

problematic.