```Date: Feb 5, 2013 1:16 AM
Author: JT
Subject: Re: Which naturals better?

On 4 Feb, 09:17, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> In article> <086315b9-274b-4e88-a43a-c8bc9ab23...@n2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,>>>>>>>>>>  JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:> > Building new natural numbers without zero using NyaN, in any base,> > this will have affects upon computational theory? The NyaN principle> > is general work for all bases.> > (Base 3)> >       (NyaN) base 3           Standard naturals base 3> > 1    =   1                                     01> > 2    =   2                                     02> > 3    =   3                                     10> > 4    =  11    =3+1                         11> > 5    =  12    =3+2                         12> > 6    =  13    =3+3                         20> > 7    =  21    =6+1                         21> > 8    =  22    =6+2                         22> > 9    =  23    =6+3                        100> > 10  =  31     =9+1                       101> > 11  =  32     =9+2                       102> > 12  =  33     =9+3                       110> > 13  =  111   =9+3+1                    111> > 14  =  112   =9+3+2                    112> > 15  =  113   =9+3+3                    120> > 16  =  121   =9+6+1                    121> > 17  =  122   =9+6+2                    122> > 18  =  123   =9+6+3                    200> > 19  =  131   =9+9+1                    201> > 20  =  132   =9+9+2                    202> > 21  =133     =9+9+3                    210>> The problem being that in this NyaN system there is no way to represent> zero as a numeral, and zero is more and more these days regarded as> natural number, since it is certainly the cardinality of a finite set,> as are all 'other' natural numbers.> --Well what i asked if anyone could help me reencode standard base toNyaN base, most i would like a generic form working for all bases likethe one i posted for standard bases.It may be that NyaN do not fit current paradigm, but they could beuseful for someone (me).And i simply forgot howto do it, it was a few lines of codes probablyless code then for standard bases.
```