Date: Feb 5, 2013 1:43 AM
Author: JT
Subject: Re: Which naturals better?

On 5 Feb, 04:30, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 Feb, 11:02, Frederick Williams <freddywilli...@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>

> > JT wrote:
>
> > > Building new natural numbers without zero using NyaN, in any base,
> > > [...]

>
> > You seem to confuse numbers and digits.  Both of these are true:
> > There is a number zero.
> > Numbers can be symbolized without the digit zero.

>
> > --
> > When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by
> > this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
> > Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting

>
> No there is no zero in my list of naturals, in my list is each natural
> number a discrete ***items***, ***entity*** with a magnitude.


Sorry a single natural is a single entity or item with a certain
magnitude, the numbers is counted in forming sets.