Date: Feb 6, 2013 12:07 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Howto use NyaN to add, subtract, muliply, divide
In article

<41ecd760-e094-437d-affc-e4790e34e2c7@14g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,

JT <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6 Feb, 00:55, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > In article

> > <0359085f-d28e-4b7f-97ab-a309742f3...@y8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On 5 Feb, 09:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > > In article

> > > > <b12ef8c3-edc7-4171-9718-a206477f5...@j9g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,

> >

> > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > On 5 Feb, 00:21, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > > > > On 4 Feb, 07:34, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > > > > > > When the formula to the NyaN completed, i would like to go on

> > > > > > > make the

> > > > > > > four elementar base arithemtic operations without any zeros,

> > > > > > > repeating

> > > > > > > never hurts.

> >

> > > > > > So for any given x in your notation, how does one express x - x

> > > > > > without

> > > > > > any zeroes?

> > > > > > --

> >

> > > > > I wrote it so many times but you refuse to accept it, there is no

> > > > > remainder so the difference is simply void

> > > > > =7-7

> > > > > =0,7-0,7

> >

> > > > But how does one differentiate a void as the result a subtraction of a

> > > > number from itself from not having any subtraction at all?

> >

> > > > Does "5 - 5 = " make any kind of sense?

> > > > --

> >

> > > For 5-5+9 you start with 5-5 and there is no remainder thus 9 not

> > > 0+9=9 for 5-5/9 thus /9 is no need to evaluate it is not a

> > > mathematical expression, and should not be taken further into a

> > > calculation

> > > thus (5-5)/9+21/3 *IS NOT* (0/9+21/3) it is simply 21/3 what i say is

> > > we should not evaluate none mathematical expressions.

> >

> > Is 9 - 9 a non-mathematical expression in your world?

> > It looks quite as mathematical as 9 - 8, at least to me.

> > --

>

> Well in my arethmitic it would of course be evaluated have *NO*

> remainder, but it would not be taken further into a calculation.

Thus 9 - 9 = "NO" in your arithmetic?

You version of arithmetic seems to cause more problems than it solves.

--