Date: Feb 6, 2013 2:10 AM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: careful on the AP Coordinate System, so not to lose function #1204<br> New Physics #1324 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed I had better watch myself and be more careful in explaining the AP

Coordinate System. I said that a point has two sides, one side a

positive and the other the negative. But I lose function if I define

it that way, since a function can only have one y value for a given x

value. If the same point has a positive and negative value, for

example the point 3.1 would have +3.1 and -3.1 simultaneously and thus

no unique y value for a given x value. So I have to be careful there.

The way I defined it some years back, was that I said the point 3.1

was itself the point and the -3.1 rested behind +3.1, but both are

distinct points. I could do this and get away with it because in AP-

Reals there is the infinity number 10^603 and so every number has a

empty space of 10^-603 from its predecessor and successor. So that

there are holes of 10^-603 between every positive number, and I would

fill or insert a negative number in between two successive positive

numbers.

So in AP-Reals the first number starting with 0 is 0 and the second

number is 1*10^-603 and the next number is 2*10^-603 and the next is

3*10^-603. So in AP Coordinate system I fill each hole with the

negative number as such:

0, -1*10^-603, 1*10^-603, -2*10^-603, 2*10^-603, onwards to 10^603

So now, I cannot be accused of losing function.

The aim of the AP system is to make negative numbers reside next to

their positive number counterparts, so that -4.5 is nearby to +4.5

rather than herding all the negatives and throwing them into a realm

far removed from positive numbers. I want to make the Coordinate

System in much the same way that protons and electrons make up the

Universe, in that they are nearby together so that the Universe is

vastly of 0 charge. Our Universe is not where all the electron lie

opposite all the protons and both separated. Our Universe is where

positive and negative lie close together and thus mathematics

coordinate system should mirror that aspect for a different coordinate

system than the Cartesian.

Now I am not throwing out the Cartesian, but only emphasizing that a

viable alternative coordinate system exists.

--

Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-

bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and

fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium

http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium

whole entire Universe is just one big atom

where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies