Date: Feb 6, 2013 2:58 AM Author: JT Subject: Re: Howto use NyaN to add, subtract, muliply, divide On 6 Feb, 08:52, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> In article

> <1648cd8e-3fdc-4f6c-a88a-bf83742ea...@hq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On 6 Feb, 06:07, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > In article

> > > <41ecd760-e094-437d-affc-e4790e34e...@14g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,

>

> > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > On 6 Feb, 00:55, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > > > In article

> > > > > <0359085f-d28e-4b7f-97ab-a309742f3...@y8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

>

> > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > On 5 Feb, 09:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > In article

> > > > > > > <b12ef8c3-edc7-4171-9718-a206477f5...@j9g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,

>

> > > > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > On 5 Feb, 00:21, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > On 4 Feb, 07:34, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > When the formula to the NyaN completed, i would like to go on

> > > > > > > > > > make the

> > > > > > > > > > four elementar base arithemtic operations without any zeros,

> > > > > > > > > > repeating

> > > > > > > > > > never hurts.

>

> > > > > > > > > So for any given x in your notation, how does one express x - x

> > > > > > > > > without

> > > > > > > > > any zeroes?

> > > > > > > > > --

>

> > > > > > > > I wrote it so many times but you refuse to accept it, there is no

> > > > > > > > remainder so the difference is simply void

> > > > > > > > =7-7

> > > > > > > > =0,7-0,7

>

> > > > > > > But how does one differentiate a void as the result a subtraction

> > > > > > > of a

> > > > > > > number from itself from not having any subtraction at all?

>

> > > > > > > Does "5 - 5 = " make any kind of sense?

> > > > > > > --

>

> > > > > > For 5-5+9 you start with 5-5 and there is no remainder thus 9 not

> > > > > > 0+9=9 for 5-5/9 thus /9 is no need to evaluate it is not a

> > > > > > mathematical expression, and should not be taken further into a

> > > > > > calculation

> > > > > > thus (5-5)/9+21/3 *IS NOT* (0/9+21/3) it is simply 21/3 what i say is

> > > > > > we should not evaluate none mathematical expressions.

>

> > > > > Is 9 - 9 a non-mathematical expression in your world?

> > > > > It looks quite as mathematical as 9 - 8, at least to me.

> > > > > --

>

> > > > Well in my arethmitic it would of course be evaluated have *NO*

> > > > remainder, but it would not be taken further into a calculation.

>

> > > Thus 9 - 9 = "NO" in your arithmetic?

>

> > > You version of arithmetic seems to cause more problems than it solves.

> > > --

>

> > no remainder

>

> Remainders are only in division anyway, but differences can be zero.

> --

No 2-2 deplete finish off eachother there is no difference when you

say the difference is zero you really say that the evaluation had no

difference.