Date: Feb 6, 2013 4:21 AM
Author: byron
Subject: ZFC  is shown to be inconsistent

It is shown that ZFC is inconsistenthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/40697621/Mathematics-Ends-in-Meaninglessness-ie-self-contradictionin ZFC IS AN AXIOM CALLED  THE Axiom schema of specificationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo%E2%80%93Fraenkel_set_theory 3. Axiom schema of specification (also called the axiom schema of separation or of restricted comprehension): If z is a set, and \phi\! is any property which may characterize the elements x of z, then there is a subset y of z containing those x in z which satisfy the property. The "restriction" to z is necessary to avoid Russell's paradox and its variant the axiom of separation is used to outlaw/block/ban impredicative statements like Russells paradoxnow the axiom of separation  of ZFC is it self  impredicative  as Solomon Ferferman points outhttp://math.stanford.edu/~feferman/papers/predicativity.pdf "in ZF the fundamental source of impredicativity is the seperation axiom which asserts that for each well formed function p(x)of the language ZF the existence of the set x : x } a ^ p(x) for any set a Since the formular p may contain quantifiers ranging over the supposed "totality" of all the sets this is impredicativity according to the VCP this impredicativity is given teeth by the axiom of infinitythus it outlaws/blocks/bans itselfthus ZFC contradicts itself and 1)ZFC is inconsistent 2) that the paradoxes it was meant to avoid are now still valid and thus mathematics is inconsistent       Now we  have paradoxes like Russells paradoxBanach-Tarskin paradoxBurili-Forti paradoxWhich are now still validZFC  is shown to be inconsistent by australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean