Date: Feb 6, 2013 9:15 AM
Author: Tony Kittler
Subject: Re: Dirac Delta Question

"Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry> wrote in message <ketnla$ki1$>...
> "Carl S." wrote in message <ketmn8$gs9$>...
> > ... the dirac delta of v ...
> The expression above alone does not make meaningful sense. A dirac is a function (to be more precise a distribution). There is no such thing as "the dirac of somethingelse".
> Bruno

Sorry Bruno, I mean that the result of the dirac delta function of the parameter v.
Here, v is a vector. What is the result of the function? A vector ? A scalar ?