Date: Feb 7, 2013 4:11 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Feb 7, 10:05 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 10:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > On Feb 7, 7:45 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > Matheology § 222   Back to the roots
>
> > > Consider a Cantor-list with entries a_n and anti-diagonal d:
>
> > Then, according to WM, d is not a line of the list.
>
> Do you agree that the logic applied in set theory does not make a
> difference between "for every" and "for all"?
> Can you explain why here, in this decisive case, a difference appears
> nevertheless?
>


Since neither standard set theory, nor the concept "all" is used
by WM in obtaining "d is not a line of the list"
I don't know what you mean by "a difference appears".