Date: Feb 7, 2013 4:11 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 7, 10:05 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 7 Feb., 10:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > On Feb 7, 7:45 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

>

> > > Consider a Cantor-list with entries a_n and anti-diagonal d:

>

> > Then, according to WM, d is not a line of the list.

>

> Do you agree that the logic applied in set theory does not make a

> difference between "for every" and "for all"?

> Can you explain why here, in this decisive case, a difference appears

> nevertheless?

>

Since neither standard set theory, nor the concept "all" is used

by WM in obtaining "d is not a line of the list"

I don't know what you mean by "a difference appears".