Date: Feb 7, 2013 8:37 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222

On 7 Feb., 14:32, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 2/7/2013 2:02 AM, WM wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > On 7 Feb., 08:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <bbdf841d-effe-48c8-b938-0825f9e82...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

>
> >>   WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >>> Matheology 222   Back to the roots
>
> >>> Consider a Cantor-list with entries a_n and anti-diagonal d:
>
> >>> For every n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) =/= (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n).
> >>> For every n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) is terminating.
> >>> For every n: (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n) is terminating.

>
> >>   Even if there is  last a_n and  a last a_nn, n, the d_m's can still go
> >> on without end..

>
> >>> For all n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) =/= (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n).
> >>> For all n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) is terminating.
> >>> For all n: (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n) is *not* terminating.

>
> >> While (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n) may be terminating,
> >> d_1, d_2, ..., d_n, ... need *not* ever terminate.

>
> > The diagonal argument includes merely all (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n).
>
> There is no plurality in the individual number
> generated in the construction of the argument.
>
> There is only an infinite plurality in the number
> of possible demonstrations in which that number can
> be used as a counter-example.
>
> Now that I understand the nature of your defect
> I will help to correct it.- Zitierten Text ausblenden -


Try to correct your defect, moron.

Regards, WM