Date: Feb 7, 2013 8:37 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222
On 7 Feb., 14:32, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

> On 2/7/2013 2:02 AM, WM wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > On 7 Feb., 08:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> >> In article

> >> <bbdf841d-effe-48c8-b938-0825f9e82...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

>

> >> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >>> Matheology 222 Back to the roots

>

> >>> Consider a Cantor-list with entries a_n and anti-diagonal d:

>

> >>> For every n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) =/= (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n).

> >>> For every n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) is terminating.

> >>> For every n: (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n) is terminating.

>

> >> Even if there is last a_n and a last a_nn, n, the d_m's can still go

> >> on without end..

>

> >>> For all n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) =/= (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n).

> >>> For all n: (a_n1, a_n2, ..., a_nn) is terminating.

> >>> For all n: (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n) is *not* terminating.

>

> >> While (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n) may be terminating,

> >> d_1, d_2, ..., d_n, ... need *not* ever terminate.

>

> > The diagonal argument includes merely all (d_1, d_2, ..., d_n).

>

> There is no plurality in the individual number

> generated in the construction of the argument.

>

> There is only an infinite plurality in the number

> of possible demonstrations in which that number can

> be used as a counter-example.

>

> Now that I understand the nature of your defect

> I will help to correct it.- Zitierten Text ausblenden -

Try to correct your defect, moron.

Regards, WM