Date: Feb 7, 2013 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 7 Feb., 14:44, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2:32 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > I do not agree that <snip> ~6
> > follows from 3.
> Nor does anyone else.
Then d is not actually infinite.
> You do agree that d in not a line of the list.
If d of
is not actually infinite, then it is in a line of the list since every
finite initial segment of d is there.