```Date: Feb 7, 2013 9:00 PM
Author: HOPEINCHRIST
Subject: Re: Which naturals better?

On Monday, February 4, 2013 12:15:23 AM UTC-6, JT wrote:> Building new natural numbers without zero using NyaN, in any base, this will have affects upon computational theory? The NyaN principle is general work for all bases. (Base 3) (NyaN) base 3 Standard naturals base 3 1 = 1 01 2 = 2 02 3 = 3 10 4 = 11 =3+1 11 5 = 12 =3+2 12 6 = 13 =3+3 20 7 = 21 =6+1 21 8 = 22 =6+2 22 9 = 23 =6+3 100 10 = 31 =9+1 101 11 = 32 =9+2 102 12 = 33 =9+3 110 13 = 111 =9+3+1 111 14 = 112 =9+3+2 112 15 = 113 =9+3+3 120 16 = 121 =9+6+1 121 17 = 122 =9+6+2 122 18 = 123 =9+6+3 200 19 = 131 =9+9+1 201 20 = 132 =9+9+2 202 21 =133 =9+9+3 210You guys are not rational,you wanna see natural mathematics from a paper tombbe publishedID: Polarity and Composite of 1919*3=57	        5+7=12*19*6=114	11+4=1519*9=171	17+1=18*	Gap of 30-18=12 and 30-12=18 , 18+12=3019*12=228	22+8=30*19*15=285	28+5=3319*18=342	34+2=36*	Gap of 48-30=18 and 48-36=12, 18+12=3019*21=399	39+9=48*19*24=456	45+6=5119*27=513	51+3=5419*30=570	57+0=57	 Note the correction of mathematics at 5719*33=627	62+7=6919*36=684	68+4=7219*39=741	74+1=75	Gap of 87-75=12 87-69=12 , 12+18=3019*42=798	79+8=87
```