Date: Feb 8, 2013 6:32 AM Author: Alan Smaill Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots William Hughes <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Feb 7, 8:17 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>> > You also
>> > show by induction that the antidiagonal of
>> > a list is not in the list.
> You contain multitudes
WM contradicts himself?
Very well, he contradicts himself.
He is small.