Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:28 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the root<br> s

On 2/10/2013 3:18 PM, WM wrote:
> On 10 Feb., 22:05, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote:
>>

>>> On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length.
>>
>>> In the list
>>
>>> 1
>>> 11
>>> 111
>>> ...

>>
>>> There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line.
>>> For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal.
>>> For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line.

>>
>> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
>> of singular term.
>>
>> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
>> of a definite article.
>>
>> the diagonal is different from its proper parts.


Define a digit.