Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:47 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 10 Feb., 22:28, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 2/10/2013 3:18 PM, WM wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > On 10 Feb., 22:05, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> >> On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote:
>
> >>> On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length.
>
> >>> In the list
>
> >>> 1
> >>> 11
> >>> 111
> >>> ...

>
> >>> There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line.
> >>> For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal.
> >>> For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line.

>
> >> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
> >> of singular term.

>
> >> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
> >> of a definite article.

>
> >> the diagonal is different from its proper parts.
>
> Define a digit.-


Learn mathematics.

Regards, WM