Date: Feb 10, 2013 5:11 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<c7249ee8-e019-43bf-8ce9-2a2099b91afc@l13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 9 Feb., 17:36, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > the arguments are yours
> > > > and the statements are yours-

> >
> > > Of course. But the wrong interpretation is yours.
> >
> > How does one interpret
> >    we have shown m does not exist
> >    (your statement)
> >
> > to mean that
> >
> >    m might still exist
> >
> > ?

>
> TND is invalid in the infinite.


As far as the vast majority of mathematics and mathematicians is
concerned, Tertium Non Datur is valid everywhere.

Those who claim otherwise do not speak for the vast majority of
mathematics and mathematicians but at most for a miniscule minority.
--