```Date: Feb 11, 2013 3:39 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 214

On 10 Feb., 23:59, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:> On 2/10/2013 3:55 PM, Virgil wrote:>>>>> >>> Please explain "existing set".>> >> An existing set is a set that is finite or potentially infinite.>> > That would require all of them to already exist, implying that no new> > ones could ever be created, or invented, or discovered.>> > Thus in WMYTHEOLOGY there can never be anything new.>> What would be the consequence of that invariance?>> Every potentially infinite set already exists.Who said so?I said if existing, then finite or pot infinite.Now you return if pot infinite then existing.Logic?Try to understand: A ==> B does not imply B ==> A.Then you may go on to learn logic step by step, but not beforeunderstanding this (small step for mankind, but obviously big step foryou).>> Thus, potential infinity is immanent infinity.No.>> This is Cantor's argument.Yes he made the same step. And his followers gladly accepted it. Heexchanged quantifyers on his "extended integers":"For every integer n, there exists integer m: m >= n"to"There exists integer m, such that for every integer n: m >= n."No reason to be proud about "understanding" that.Regards, WM
```