Date: Feb 11, 2013 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 11 Feb., 20:45, William Hughes <> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 8:20 pm, WM <> wrote:
> <snip>

> > And everything that is in some line
> > of the list is in one line of the list.

> > Anything wrong with this conclusion?
> Only that you also conclude that there
> does not exist a natural number m
> such that the potentially infinite sequence
> d is equal to the potentially infinite
> sequence given by the mth line.

If it such a line existed, then d was *completely* in that line.
Therefore from the conclusion it should be clear that it is impossible
to find a complete d in a line.

Potential infinity is not complete. (Therefore it cannot be subject to
Cantor's argument.)

Regards, WM