Date: Feb 12, 2013 3:34 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Feb 12, 9:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 11 Feb., 22:47, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> You do not see a contradiction in concluding
> > both
>
> >    everything that is in some line
> >    of the list is in one line of the list.
>
> > and
>
> >    there does not exist a natural number m
> >    such that the potentially infinite sequence
> >    d is equal to the potentially infinite
> >    sequence given by the mth line.
>
> Why do you distract the attention of the reader?
> Of course I see a contradiction.

And unless you retract one or the other side,
you will continue to assert a contradiction.