Date: Feb 12, 2013 3:44 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 12 Feb., 09:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 12, 9:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > On 11 Feb., 22:47, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> You do not see a contradiction in concluding

> > > both

>

> > > everything that is in some line

> > > of the list is in one line of the list.

>

> > > and

>

> > > there does not exist a natural number m

> > > such that the potentially infinite sequence

> > > d is equal to the potentially infinite

> > > sequence given by the mth line.

>

> > Why do you distract the attention of the reader?

> > Of course I see a contradiction.

>

> And unless you retract one or the other side,

> you will continue to assert a contradiction.

Why are you lying?

You know that I would be asserting a contradiction if and only if the

premise was correct.

Premise: The infinite sequence d can be somewhere.

Conclusion: The infinite sequence d is in the list and is not in the

list.

Every mathematician with some basic eduction in logic would know what

to conclude. And I am sure, you also know it. Therefore I accuse you

of lying, namely saying the untruth when knowíng the truth.

Regards, WM