Date: Feb 12, 2013 4:13 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<9f87d9d9-0974-4098-80c1-9ed239f0b541@ia3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 12 Feb., 13:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Feb 12, 10:17 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

>

> 1

> 12

> 123

> ...

>

> > > That means d is something that never is so complete that more than

> > > FISs of it exist. Therefore only FISs of it can be somewhere.

> >

> > Thus we have: There is one line of the list that contains

> > every FIS of d.

>

> Every FIS of d is (in) a line of the list.

But, by construction, no line of the list is a FIS of d.

> Every line of the list is a FIS of d and contains all smaller FISs of

> d.

If the list starts .0, .10, .110, and d starts .111..., as it would

have to, then NONE of these lines of the list is a FIS of d.

SO WM is, as usual, TOTALLY WRONG AGAIN!

> There is no line of the list that contains all FISs of d (because

> there are not all).

If there are not all FISs of d then there is no d.

But that can only happen in weird unreal places like Wolkenmuekenheim.

>

> >

> > and

> >

> > the potentially infinite sequence d is not equal to the

> > potentially infinite sequence given by a line of the list.

> >

> > This is still a contradiction.

>

> Why? A line of the list cannot give d (since there is no completed d).

There is outside of the dank dark dismal depths of Wolkenmuekenheim.

>

> There is no contradiction.

There are lots of them in the dank dark dismal depths of

Wolkenmuekenheim.

--