```Date: Feb 12, 2013 4:13 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article <9f87d9d9-0974-4098-80c1-9ed239f0b541@ia3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 12 Feb., 13:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> > On Feb 12, 10:17 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> > > 1> 12> 123> ...> > > > That means d is something that never is so complete that more than> > > FISs of it exist. Therefore only FISs of it can be somewhere.> >> > Thus we have: There is one line of the list that contains> > every FIS of d.> > Every FIS of d is (in) a line of the list. But, by construction, no line of the list is a FIS of d.> Every line of the list is a FIS of d and contains all smaller FISs of> d.If the list starts .0, .10, .110,  and d starts .111..., as it would have to, then NONE of these lines of the list is a FIS of d.SO WM is, as usual, TOTALLY WRONG AGAIN!> There is no line of the list that contains all FISs of d (because> there are not all).If there are not all FISs of d then there is no d.But that can only happen in weird unreal places like Wolkenmuekenheim. > > >> > and> >> > the potentially infinite sequence d is not equal to the> > potentially infinite sequence given by a line of the list.> >> > This is still a contradiction.> > Why? A line of the list cannot give d (since there is no completed d).There is outside of the dank dark dismal depths of Wolkenmuekenheim.> > There is no contradiction.There are lots of them in the dank dark dismal depths of Wolkenmuekenheim.--
```