Date: Feb 12, 2013 11:26 PM
Author: GS Chandy
Subject: Re: Largest Known Prime Number Discovered

Joe Niederberger posted Feb 13, 2013 12:55 AM:
> I was far too dry in my first response,

I personally believe your first response ( was just about perfect - but you've fully earned your second and more chances if you want them.
> please allow me a second chance:
> A confused constructivist response:
> Thank God!
> A ultra-finitist response:
> How many more?

As you had correctly stated: "There's more where that came from!" - and that's about all we can say about it (I believe).