Date: Feb 15, 2013 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 15 Feb., 00:53, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > And just this criterion is satisfied for the system
> > > > 1
> > > > 12
> > > > 123
> > > > ...
> > > > For every n all FISs of d are identical with all FISs of line n.
> > For every n there is an (n+1)st fison of d not identical to any FIS of
> > line n.
> That does not prove d is not in the list, but only that d is not in
> the first n lines of the list.
For every n.
So that demolishes WM's claim that there is some n such that d IS in
the first n lines.