Date: Feb 16, 2013 7:05 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 15 Feb., 23:27, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> In article

> <8847efa6-6663-40e9-a61e-76bba7f34...@dp10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

>

>

>

>

>

> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 15 Feb., 00:53, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > And just this criterion is satisfied for the system

>

> > > > > 1

> > > > > 12

> > > > > 123

> > > > > ...

>

> > > > > For every n all FISs of d are identical with all FISs of line n.

>

> > > For every n there is an (n+1)st fison of d not identical to any FIS of

> > > line n.

>

> > That does not prove d is not in the list, but only that d is not in

> > the first n lines of the list.

>

> For every n.

For every n there are infinitely many lines following.

You never can conclude having all n.

Regards, WM