Date: Feb 16, 2013 10:26 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 16, 3:32 pm, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 16, 1:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > On 15 Feb., 23:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > So WMs statements are

>

> > > there is a line l such that d and l

> > > are coFIS

>

> > Of course, for every n there is a line 1, 2, 3, ..., n that is coFIS

> .> to the diagonal 1, 2, 3, ..., n.

>

> Nope. a line is either coFIS to d or it is not.

>

> It makes sense to say

>

> For every n there is a line, l(n) such that

increment my OOPs counter

> the nth FIS of l(n) is the nth FIS of d .

> But this does not make l(n) coFIS to d.

>

> > > And there is not more than every n.

>

> > > there is no line l such that d and l

> > > are coFIS

> > That would only be true if there was an n larger than every n

>

> ?? The statement is yours. Are you now withdrawing it.