Date: Feb 16, 2013 10:26 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Feb 16, 3:32 pm, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 1:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

> > On 15 Feb., 23:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > So WMs statements are
>
> > > there is a line l such that d and l
> > > are coFIS

>
> > Of course, for every n there is a line 1, 2, 3, ..., n that is coFIS
> .> to the diagonal 1, 2, 3, ..., n.
>
> Nope.  a line  is either coFIS to d or it is not.
>
> It makes sense to say
>
>      For every n there is a line, l(n) such that


increment my OOPs counter

>      the nth FIS of l(n) is the nth FIS of d .
>      But this does not make l(n) coFIS to d.
>

> > > And there is not more than every n.
>
> > > there is no line l such that d and l
> > > are coFIS

> > That would only be true if there was an n larger than every n
>
> ??  The statement is yours.  Are you now withdrawing it.