Date: Feb 17, 2013 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 17 Feb., 20:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 6:49 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > ards, WM
> > Ok we have WM statement 1.
> > There is a line l such that
> > l and d are coFIS.
> There is no d!
> There is for every FIS of d a FIS of a line.
If there were no d, then WM would not keep talkimg as if there were one.
> That's all we can know and say about d.
That may be all WM can say, but what he says is already more than the
> > WM denies saying
> > There is no line l such that
> > l and d are coFIS
> > Do you agree
> > For every natural number n,
> > the nth line and d are not coFIS.
> On the contrary! For every latural number the n-th line and d_1, ...,
> d_n are coFIS.
Not in this world!