Date: Feb 17, 2013 4:43 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<2199d024-064f-4369-b38d-f1d1cdf2cc7f@d11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 17 Feb., 20:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 6:49 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > ards, WM
> >
> > Ok we have WM statement 1.
> >
> >    There is a line l such that
> >    l and d are coFIS.

>
> There is no d!
> There is for every FIS of d a FIS of a line.


If there were no d, then WM would not keep talkimg as if there were one.

> That's all we can know and say about d.

That may be all WM can say, but what he says is already more than the
truth.
> >
> > WM denies saying
> >
> >    There is no line l such that
> >    l and d are coFIS
> >
> > Do you agree
> >
> > For every natural number n,
> > the nth line and d are not coFIS.

>
> On the contrary! For every latural number the n-th line and d_1, ...,
> d_n are coFIS.


Not in this world!
--