```Date: Feb 18, 2013 3:58 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article <f8f4c024-35d7-46da-8831-a89f04fc29e1@h17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 17 Feb., 23:26, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> > On Feb 17, 10:02 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> >> > > There is no d!> >> > There is no potentially infinite sequence,> > x, such that the nth FIS of x consists of> > n 1's> >> There is every FIS of the diagonal - up to every n.> Same holds for the lines of the listIf there is no list, but only a  non-x then there is no "diagonal" ether.> >> > x is not the diagonal of the potentially> > infinite list> >> > 1000...> > 11000...> > 111000...> > ...> >> > ?!?> > There is for every n a line in the list> 1> 12> 123> ...> 123...n> ...> > such that this line is coFIS with the diagonal d_1, ..., d_n.The "diagonal" of what?Normally for your list, one would have d_1 = 1, d_2 = 12, d_3 = 123, etc.  in which case, d_1, ..., d_n = 1,12,123,...,123...n.and then no line after the first will be coFIS with any such sequence.> > Do you know of an n that contradicts this claim?All except n - 1 contradict it.> > There is nothing more in the diagonal. Again you assert an actually> infinite d. That is an error.  Only inside the walls of Wolkenmuekenheim.,--
```