Date: Feb 18, 2013 3:58 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<f8f4c024-35d7-46da-8831-a89f04fc29e1@h17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 17 Feb., 23:26, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Feb 17, 10:02 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >

> > > There is no d!

> >

> > There is no potentially infinite sequence,

> > x, such that the nth FIS of x consists of

> > n 1's

> >

> There is every FIS of the diagonal - up to every n.

> Same holds for the lines of the list

If there is no list, but only a non-x then there is no "diagonal" ether.

> >

> > x is not the diagonal of the potentially

> > infinite list

> >

> > 1000...

> > 11000...

> > 111000...

> > ...

> >

> > ?!?

>

> There is for every n a line in the list

> 1

> 12

> 123

> ...

> 123...n

> ...

>

> such that this line is coFIS with the diagonal d_1, ..., d_n.

The "diagonal" of what?

Normally for your list, one would have d_1 = 1, d_2 = 12, d_3 = 123,

etc. in which case,

d_1, ..., d_n = 1,12,123,...,123...n.

and then no line after the first will be coFIS with any such sequence.

>

> Do you know of an n that contradicts this claim?

All except n - 1 contradict it.

>

> There is nothing more in the diagonal. Again you assert an actually

> infinite d. That is an error.

Only inside the walls of Wolkenmuekenheim.,

--