Date: Feb 18, 2013 3:58 PM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: if magnetic monopoles were both attractive and repelling you then<br> destroy Lenz's law #1239 New Physics #1359 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Deriving the idea that the magnetic monopoles are all attractive

force, not repulsion. Magnetic monopoles must all be a positive term

in the Maxwell Equations. If you had magnetic monopoles in the

Symmetrical Maxwell Equations then you destroy the Lenz's law of the

negative term in the Faraday law. You destroy Lenz's law because you

would have extra negative terms in the summation of the Maxwell

Equations.

Alright many posts ago I wrote how the Maxwell Equations, the

symmetrical Maxwell Equations when summed together produce both the

Schrodinger and Dirac Equations as subsets, minor subsets of the

Maxwell Equations. But today I want to tease out of the Maxwell

Equations the idea that all magnetic monopoles are attractive force.

This means that no matter whether you have north to north, north to

south, south to north or south to south magnetic monopoles that all

four possibilities is always an attraction force and never a repelling

force.

So let me see if I can derive that idea. And I would hazard to say

that I believe no physicist of today, other than myself is capable of

doing this task, but that hundreds of mathematicians are capable of

doing this task. Physicists of the last 100 years were so bad in

mathematics that only 2 physicists could venture to use mathematics

into physics, Schrodinger and Dirac and we see now that even their

attempts come up as minor subsets of the true physics. For in the

total summation of the Symmetrical Maxwell Equations, we get not only

the Dirac Equation as a minor subset, but we get so much much more.

From the Dirac Equation we could not get the fact that magnetic

monopoles are all attractive regardless of what pole they are, whether

north or south. But in the summation of Maxwell Equations we can

derive that idea as I spell out below.

Alright, these are the 4 symmetrical Maxwell Equations with magnetic

monopoles:

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

Now to derive the Dirac Equation from the Maxwell Equations we add the

lot together:

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

________________

div*E + div*B + (-1)curlxE + curlxB = r_E + r_B + dB + dE + J_E + J_B

Now Wikipedia has a good description of how Dirac derived his famous

equation which gives this:

(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t - mc/h) p = 0

So how is the above summation of Maxwell Equations that of a

generalized Dirac Equation? Well, the four terms of div and curl are

the A,B,C,D terms. And the right side of the equation can all be

conglomerated into one term and ?the negative sign in the Faraday law

can turn that right side into ?the negative sign. Alright the

Schrodinger Eq. is easily derived from the Maxwell Equations. In the

Dirac Equation we need more than one of the Maxwell ?Equations because

it is a 4x4 matrix equation and so the full 4 Maxwell Equations are

needed to cover the Dirac Equation, although ?the?Dirac Equation ends

up being a minor subset of the 4 Maxwell ?Equations, because the Dirac

Equation does not allow the photon to be a double transverse wave

while the Summation of the Maxwell Equations demands the photon be a

double transverse wave. But the Schrodinger Equation:

ihd(f(w)) = Hf(w) where f(w) is the wave function

The Schrodinger Equation is easily derived from the mere Gauss's laws

combined: ?These are the 4 symmetrical Maxwell Equations with magnetic

monopoles:

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

Now the two Gauss's law of Maxwell Equations standing alone are

nonrelativistic and so is the Schrodinger Equation.

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

____________

div*E + div*B = r_E + r_B

this is reduced to

k(d(f(x))) = H(f(x))

Now Schrodinger derived his equation out of thin air, using the?Fick's

law of diffusion. So Schrodinger never really used the Maxwell

Equations. The Maxwell Equations were foreign to Schrodinger and to

all the physicists of the 20th century when it came time to find the

wave function. But how easy it would have been for?Schrodinger if he

instead, reasoned that the Maxwell Equations derives all of Physics,

and that he should only focus on the Maxwell Equations. Because if he

had reasoned that the Maxwell Equations were?the axiom set of all of

physics and then derived the Schrodinger Equation from the two Gauss

laws, he would and could have further reasoned that if you Summation

all 4 Maxwell Equations, that Schrodinger would then have derived the

relativistic wave equation ?and thus have found the Dirac Equation

long before Dirac ever had the ?idea of finding a relativistic wave

equation. ?Now, how is it that we derive all monopoles are attractive

regardless of polarity from the Summation of Maxwell Equations? I

need ?mathematicians to verify my claim. And I think the physicists of

today are too dumb to be able to proceed in this.

I roughly figure that if you had a repulsion or repelling in the

polarity of magnetic monopoles that you would have to introduce

another negative term in the Summation whereas the summation as it

stands now has only one negative term in the Faraday law component. If

magnetic monopoles had repulsion then the magnetic current density and

the Gauss's law of magnetism would also require negative terms. But

if ?all monopoles had one polarity, had only attraction force, then no

need to have negative terms in the Maxwell Equation other than the

Faraday law negative term.

Again, I need competent mathematicians to verify for my opinion is

that no physicist of today is competent enough. Of course, if Dirac

were still alive and in prime, would be the best qualified of all. I

dare say, if Feynman were alive, he too would be competent enough.

But ?sadly, both are gone and the physicists remaining are not worth

the ?asking.

--

Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-

bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and

fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium

http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium

whole entire Universe is just one big atom

where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies