Date: Feb 18, 2013 4:42 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 17 Feb., 22:43, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <2199d024-064f-4369-b38d-f1d1cdf2c...@d11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 17 Feb., 20:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 17, 6:49 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > ards, WM

>
> > > Ok we have WM statement 1.
>
> > >    There is a line l such that
> > >    l and d are coFIS.

>
> > There is no d!
> > There is for every FIS of d a FIS of a line.

>
> If there were no d, then WM would not keep talkimg as if there were one.


There is no actually infinite d.

> > On the contrary! For every natural number the n-th line and d_1, ...,
> > d_n are coFIS.

>
> Not in this world!


123...n and 123...n have the same FISs.

Regards, WM