Date: Feb 18, 2013 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 17 Feb., 22:43, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > On 17 Feb., 20:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 17, 6:49 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > ards, WM
> > > Ok we have WM statement 1.
> > > There is a line l such that
> > > l and d are coFIS.
> > There is no d!
> > There is for every FIS of d a FIS of a line.
> If there were no d, then WM would not keep talkimg as if there were one.
There is no actually infinite d.
> > On the contrary! For every natural number the n-th line and d_1, ...,
> > d_n are coFIS.
> Not in this world!
123...n and 123...n have the same FISs.