Date: Feb 19, 2013 6:44 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 19 Feb., 03:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>
> so that there is no n for which FIS_n(L) = FIS_n(d).


I do not argue with FISs of the list, but with FISs of lines.
>
> And with an antidiagonal, things are even worse for WM.



Not in the special list

0.0
0.1
0.11
0.111
...

And it is well known that one counter example kills even the best
proof.

Regards, WM