Date: Feb 19, 2013 6:44 AM Author: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots On 19 Feb., 03:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> so that there is no n for which FIS_n(L) = FIS_n(d).
I do not argue with FISs of the list, but with FISs of lines.
> And with an antidiagonal, things are even worse for WM.
Not in the special list
And it is well known that one counter example kills even the best