Date: Feb 19, 2013 10:42 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 19, 4:15 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 19 Feb., 14:10, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > On Feb 19, 12:41 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > On 18 Feb., 23:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > On Feb 18, 10:40 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > > > On 18 Feb., 19:19, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > Is there a potentially infinite sequence,

> > > > > > > > x, such that the nth FIS of x consists of

> > > > > > > > n 1's

>

> > > > > 1

> > > > > 11

> > > > > 111

> > > > > ...

>

> > > > > > > Yes, of course

>

> > > > > > Let y be a potentially infinite sequence

> > > > > > where the nth FIS of y consists of a 1 followed

> > > > > > by n-1 0's

>

> > > > > 1

> > > > > 10

> > > > > 100

> > > > > 1000

> > > > > ...

>

> > > > > > Are x and y coFIS?

>

> > > > > No.

>

> > > > Is y the first line of the potentially

> > > > infinite list of potentially infinite

> > > > sequences

>

> > > > L=

>

> > > > 1000...

> > > > 11000...

> > > > 111000...

> > > > ...

>

> > > > ?-

>

> > > The n-th term of y and of the first line of L are coFIS up to every n.

>

> > If two potentially infinite sequences have the same FIS's

> > up to every n then they are coFIS.

>

> > The concept "coFIS up to n" has not been and need not be defined.

>

> It is self-evident that "for every natural number" is identical with

> "up to every natural number". More than "up to number n" with n a

> natural number not fixed though is not a meaningful expression in this

> connection.

>

>

>

> > Are y and the first line of L coFIS?-

>

> Yes, obviously.

>

> Regards, WM

Let z be a potentially infinite sequence such that

for some natural number m, the mth FIS of

z contains a zero.

Are z and x coFIS?