Date: Feb 19, 2013 5:35 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<e2bd4578-58a9-4d14-9544-4e3e960552dc@z9g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 19 Feb., 03:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>

> >

> > so that there is no n for which FIS_n(L) = FIS_n(d).

>

> I do not argue with FISs of the list, but with FISs of lines.

> >

> > And with an antidiagonal, things are even worse for WM.

>

>

> Not in the special list

>

> 0.0

> 0.1

> 0.11

> 0.111

> ...

In any list, L, in which FIS_n(L) is not a subset of FIS_(n+1)(L),

there need not be a :diagonal: but there is still an anti-diagonal.

For your special list above, A = 1.00000... works quite nicely as an

antidiagonal, since no FIS of A is a line of your special list.

>

> And it is well known that one counter example kills even the best

> proof.

Then my counterexamples kill all your proofs.

--