Date: Feb 20, 2013 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 19 Feb., 23:35, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > On 19 Feb., 03:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > so that there is no n for which FIS_n(L) = FIS_n(d).
> > I do not argue with FISs of the list, but with FISs of lines.
> > > And with an antidiagonal, things are even worse for WM.
> > Not in the special list
> > 0.0
> > 0.1
> > 0.11
> > 0.111
> > ...
> In any list, L, in which FIS_n(L) is not a subset of FIS_(n+1)(L),
> there need not be a :diagonal: but there is still an anti-diagonal.
> For your special list above, A = 1.00000... works quite nicely as an
> antidiagonal, since no FIS of A is a line of your special list.
But 0.111... also works according to Cantor. If, however, 0.111... is
nothing but all its FISs, then there is nothing of 0.111... missing in