Date: Feb 20, 2013 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 20 Feb., 00:04, Virgil <> wrote:
> In article
> <>,
>  WM <> wrote:

> > It is self-evident that "for every natural number" is identical with
> > "up to every natural number".

> And to "for all natural numbers", as a quantifier.

No, there are not all natural numbers, because that would be a set
without the possibility to obtain further natural numbers. But it is
the most important feauture of any set of natural numbers, that it is
not complete.

Regards, WM