Date: Feb 20, 2013 8:11 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the root<br> s

On 2/20/2013 4:15 AM, WM wrote:
> On 18 Feb., 14:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>>> Please answer as politely: Is there any n with no line containing
>>> d_1, ..., d_n

>>
>> No.

>
> Please answer without using phrases like "all" or "totality" or
> "complete collection" or "whole class" or "finished infinite" or "the
> set": Can you name a union of FISs of the diagonal that is missing in
> every line of the list?


Clarify "union"

You have rejected the basic meaning of most mathematics.

If, by union, you mean

U{x,y,z}={a,b,c,...,m}

where each of a,...,m is an element of some x,y, or z

then you are admitting a finite collection predicate.