Date: Feb 20, 2013 8:11 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the root<br> s

On 2/20/2013 4:15 AM, WM wrote:
> On 18 Feb., 14:11, William Hughes <> wrote:

>>> Please answer as politely: Is there any n with no line containing
>>> d_1, ..., d_n

>> No.

> Please answer without using phrases like "all" or "totality" or
> "complete collection" or "whole class" or "finished infinite" or "the
> set": Can you name a union of FISs of the diagonal that is missing in
> every line of the list?

Clarify "union"

You have rejected the basic meaning of most mathematics.

If, by union, you mean


where each of a,...,m is an element of some x,y, or z

then you are admitting a finite collection predicate.